Govern consequential actions. Prove what happened.
Verify what was authorized, attempted, and observed.
Agents propose. Aarmos authorizes. Enterprise systems execute. Aarmos proves.
Bring your own agents, models, and infrastructure. On supported execution paths, Aarmos decides whether consequential actions are authorized under your policies before dispatch and produces signed evidence you can verify independently.
Receipt → Replay → Verify
r_01HXZK · policy@v7
same inputs → same Decision
chain intact · policy pinned · signature valid
Governed actions produce signed evidence that can be verified independently. Replay reruns the decision against the pinned policy — the verifier is portable and runs without Aarmos. See the full demo →
See Aarmos evaluate a consequential action before execution, then inspect and verify the evidence it leaves behind.
The guided demonstration uses fixture data; real runs use your configured environment and credentials.
- 01Agent proposes
- 02Aarmos decides
- 03Authority established
- 04Enterprise system executes
- 05Evidence recorded
Aarmos enforces policy only on actions that pass through supported integrations. Actions outside those paths may not be visible to Aarmos.
Govern consequential actions.
Define enterprise intent around who may perform which consequence, against which resource, and under what authority — evaluated before governed execution.
Explore governance →02 · ProveProduce verifiable evidence.
Governed actions produce signed, portable evidence that can be verified independently and offline.
Verify a receipt →03 · UnderstandUnderstand what happened.
Inspect decisions, authority, attempts, observed effects, policy context and execution uncertainty from the recorded evidence.
See operations →04 · ImproveImprove governance continuously.
Replay prior decisions, compare policy alternatives and identify governance friction — without automatically changing active policy.
See replay →Access is not authorization to act
Access controls are necessary. Consequence control is different.
IAM can determine whether an agent may access a system. Network and API controls determine whether traffic can reach it. Aarmos governs whether a specific consequential action should be allowed to happen under enterprise policy and authority.
- Determine whether an identity may access a systemDetermine whether a specific proposed consequence is authorized under policy and authority
- Record activity within their respective systemsProduce signed governance evidence for governed actions
- Enforce controls within each system or integrationApply canonical enterprise intent across supported origins
- Detect and audit activity, including after executionDecide before governed dispatch on enforcing paths
- Provide system-specific records and interpretationsSupport independent verification of signed evidence
Existing controls
Determine whether an identity may access a system
Aarmos
Determine whether a specific proposed consequence is authorized under policy and authority
Existing controls
Record activity within their respective systems
Aarmos
Produce signed governance evidence for governed actions
Existing controls
Enforce controls within each system or integration
Aarmos
Apply canonical enterprise intent across supported origins
Existing controls
Detect and audit activity, including after execution
Aarmos
Decide before governed dispatch on enforcing paths
Existing controls
Provide system-specific records and interpretations
Aarmos
Support independent verification of signed evidence
Aarmos composes with IAM, network controls, credential custody and existing enterprise security infrastructure; it does not replace them.
Trust boundaries, data flow, enforcement limits, bypasses and independent verification.
Read →For PlatformSupported origins, deployment, rollout, day-two operation and upgrade behavior.
Read →For ArchitectureWhere Aarmos sits between autonomous software and consequential systems.
Read →Scripted with fixture data. Real runs use your keys, on your device.